Climbing (Down) The Ladder!

July 29th, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

I’m working on a longer post about monetization, but like every blog owner I go around checking out backlinks and mentions.  Much to my amusement, my blog ranks higher in Technorati for the tag “Autofellatio/Self-Sucking” than for any online marketing term.  I always knew that I would live or die by colorful use of metaphor, but I had no idea I would begin to capture the vaunted online marketing/autofellatio demographic so early in the game.

http://technorati.com/tag/Autofellatio/Self-Sucking

Next stop: the bank.



The Rumors of Email Marketing’s Death Have Been Greatly Overhyped By Morons

July 27th, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

I’ve been consulting on email marketing as part of the larger field of online marketing for a number of years, so it comes as no surprise to me when the digerati (i.e. - hyperventilating nerds with blogs) declare email DEAD as a form of online marketing for the 652nd time. R.I.P., email, your time is up! What a bunch of slack jawed dumbasses these people are. As if to buttress my point, they generally start with a bombastic headline and then completely retreat from their stance with a giant caveat by the end of their post. It’s as bad as sports writing or cable financial news networks, if not worse. Bloggers, making weathermen look prescient since the 1990s!

Blogosphere Reacting to Bold, Stupid Prediction - 2007

What brought this up was a brief comment discussion I got into with Mark Brownlow over at Email Marketing Reports -my first blogger circlejerk linkfest! Woooohoo, how exciting! Even though we probably disagree on a lot of finer points about where the lines are in email marketing, I think Mark’s blog is pretty damn informative as blogs go. Just to make sure, I stopped to read about six months worth of entries and it held up. Anyway, in response to my comments and of his own volition, Mark posted a roundup of positive comments and posts concerning the state of email marketing that were made by people with the correct number of chromosomes and who, consequently, breathe with their mouths closed (without aid of a paper bag).

Mark’s entry can be found here and has links to some halfway decent posts on the topic:

Email is dead. Long live email.

In particular, the retort to the recent spate of news stories and breathless blogger tirades about how “TEENS HAVE GIVEN UP ON EMAIL” is welcome. I caught that on the news today and when I heard it spoken aloud without a trace of irony I nearly spit the dummy. Morons.

As always, enjoy! Or don’t!

p.s. - I’ve decided that the best way to avoid scraping and feed hijacking is to curse profusely in your blog entries, rendering them un-fucking-suitable for commercial application.



07/27/2007: The Week In Threadlines

July 27th, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

Yes, it’s the blog version of The Cosby Show’s annual retrospective/clip episode, but since everything on the internet moves 52 times as fast, you get a weekly version.

Every week, I post “Threadlines” at the top of the page as I read various online marketing forums. These are usually threads that catch my eye because they either contain interesting info, contain the kernel of an interesting question or are in some other way noteworthy to me. WF is WickedFire, EF is EarnersForum, DP is DelhiPoint and no one else motivated me to post a thread this week. It’s hard to imagine of what limited worth most online marketing forums are.

Here’s the weekly compilation:

Enjoy! Or don’t!



Top 5 Dumbass Forum Questions - Affiliate Marketing Edition

July 24th, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

We’ve all been dumbasses at one time or another and we tend to be dumbasses in one regard or another throughout our lives. When you read online marketing forums regularly, which is a punishment rendered unconstitutional by the eighth amendment, you encounter a level of pugnacious stupidity that can only be described as: Fuck You.

The other thing that happens when you read online marketing forums as much as I do is you see patterns emerge. For the uninitiated, you can imagine that this is similar to something out of the scenes in A Beautiful Mind where Russell Crowe, playing John Nash, stares at a board full of numbers until the numbers begin to float off the board and start forming patterns in his mind. The difference is that I’m not very bright (a statement backed up by the fact that I read online marketing forums daily) and in my world I read the same fucking questions day after day until they begin to float off the screen and form patterns of dumb, but instead of having paranoid delusions and talking to my imaginary roommate (who is deaf) I just stare really hard at the reply button, count to ten and then close the tab instead. I can only imagine how shithouse crazy Nash would have gone trying to deal with the boastful, dishonest, imaptient simians who populate our industry.

Anyway, having seen the same questions for years now, I thought I’d put together a top 5 list of forum posts that I see EVERY GODDAMN DAY for every field of online marketing that I read about (every broadly and commonly defined field, anyway) and answer them. Why not top 10? Because I’m a lazy piece of shit. Reading and understanding the complex and detailed answers on this list is a good way to avoid looking like a newb on various online marketing forums:

#1) IS AZOOGLE/CJ/LS/Affiliate Fuel DOWN?!??!?!?!?!!?!?!?

Carl’s Jr. thinks you are an unfit online marketer. Now go back to clapping at the fish tank for a few minutes and then hit refresh on your browser, moron. The internet is built for failure, but the odds that your affiliate network is down instead of your internet connection being wonky are infinitesimal. Do not ever ask this again. Carl’s Jr., fuck you.


#2) “What is cloaking?”/”Do I need to cloak links?”

“Cloaking” is one of those things that causes the guerilla online marketing types to go off on tangents, trying things that look really stupid to anyone who has ever written more than ten functional lines of any given scripting language.

Basically, the concept behind “cloaking links” is that, for a variety of reasons, it’s better to hide the links generated by your affiliate network behind links using another domain. These new links that you create then redirect to the link generated by the affiliate network. How do guerilla marketers commonly accomplish this? There are several common methods, all of which are functional and all of which I think are wasteful and dumb for reasons that I go into further down the page:

  • Creating individual pages for each offer and using meta-refresh tags to refresh the user to the affiliate offer.
  • Using hardcoded javascript to catch the outbound click and send it to the affiliate offer.
  • Using hardcoded redirects in your htaccess file to issue 301 redirects to the affiliate offer.
  • Using hardcoded PHP (or any web scripting language) to intercept variables about the incoming querystring or the incoming referrer and redirecting the user, using the header() tag, based on those variables.

Voy-la, you have cloaked the affiliate link. You haven’t done it very intelligently and you’ve created a ton of blue collar legwork for yourself in the future, but BY GOD you done cloaked them fuckers!

What are some reasons that disguising your links, however you accomplish it, is a generally good practice? Well:

  • Many adblocker apps, spyware apps, antivirus apps and other programs of a similar nature have indexed a number of the domains used by major affiliate networks for their inbound links. These programs act as a proxy between the browser and the intarnets and strip out content containing these links before it gets to your customers’ eyeballs. Functionally, this means that a page full of AffiliateFuel links might end up looking at lot like a page full of nihilist beliefs. This is why a number of networks, such as Commission Junction, have taken to generating links for publishers with dynamic domains like qu2739.com or h9021u.com (though you shouldn’t rely on their cloaking for reasons we’ll explain shortly).
  • Dongs.
  • Depending on the terms of your particular network or offer, you may be doing something that the network or advertiser wouldn’t necessarily like. Sometimes it’s not even against the rules, it’s just something that you think might not make you the most popular guy at Affiliate Summit next year. If an affiliate network stumbles across your chicanery by googling their tracking redirect URL you’re going to feel pretty stupid.
  • It is considered by some to be true that having lots of affiliate network links in your page affects the ranking of your page in various search engines. SEO is one of my weaker fields, so I can’t speak with much authority on this, but given all the other reasons it doesn’t stand alone.
  • Leaving affiliate links exposed on your page makes you a target for the less ethical among us (imagine someone less ethical than the average online marketer!) to scrape the content of your page and simply replace your publisher id with theirs. As time goes on, some networks are beginning to hash their links and take other steps to alleviate this problem, but it’s still a problem.
  • Many other reasons.

What is the number one problem with “cloaking” your links? It’s a half-assed, dipshit measure. A “cloaked link” is a redirected link, not a cloaked link. Cloaking is just one of the positive side-effects of redirection. Another positive side-effect is that redirecting a link gives you a chance to gather important information about the transaction, but most guerilla shops miss this in their willy nilly drive to cloak the links.

To better explain, we’ll pretend that you run a PPC campaign that links directly to a landing page full of affiliate offers. If you simply “cloak” the links on this page, you lose all kinds of important data about the transaction and, potentially, the conversion. What kind of information, you ask?

  • The PPC network that was the source of the user.
  • The keyword that the user clicked on.
  • The ad that the user clicked on.
  • The date and time of the click.
  • The offer on the page that got clicked.
  • The actual, database tracked conversion ratio instead of the estimated Google analytics version that you currently use.

Furthermore, once you record this data on the redirect you can assign a transaction id to it in your database and pass that id on to the affiliate network. If the transaction results in a conversion, you can download the subid report from your network (that contains this transaction id, details about the affiliate offer that was completed and the revenue generated) and then true up their records with yours to find out:

  • How much this transaction earned.
  • Your conversion ratio at the affiliate end for this offer.

Now you’ve got data on impressions and clicks from the PPC network, you’ve got data on the transaction that occurred on your page and you’ve got data about what happened after the user got handed off to the shysters at the affiliate network and, subsequently, their advertiser. When you combine all of this, what can you get?

  • Average/Daily/Monthly/Hourly revenue per keyword.
  • Average/Daily/Monthly/Hourly revenue per PPC network.
  • Average/Daily/Monthly/Hourly revenue per ad.
  • Average/Daily/Monthly/Hourly revenue per offer.
  • Average/Daily/Monthly/Hourly revenue per click/impression/conversion.
  • Let your imagination wander!

What’s the best way to accomplish this? Keeping it fairly simple, have a database to record your links from your affiliate networks and have an admin interface to spit out redirect links for your given domain or domains. Have scripting on your site that knows how to interpret the redirect links (using native querystring variables or disguising them using mod_rewrite rules) to pass the click on to the appropriate offer. During the process, add logic to detect any incoming variables you want to track, write them to a tracking table in the database and spit out a transaction id for every record into the subid field used by the affiliate network (sub, u1, whatever). This is not something that Captain Guerilla of the USS Excel is going to be able to accomplish on his or her own, but it’s not a very big project for a developer once they understand the constraints.

So, hopefully after reading this one can understand what “cloaking” is, why the core concept is an important practice, but also how much data is being wasted every time a link is simply “cloaked” instead of tracked during the redirection. This level of tracking actually isn’t that difficult to achieve. The hard part is the reporting, but you guys spend all day pasting shit in and out of spreadsheets like some kind of awestruck 1982 accountant who has just received his first copy of VisiCalc, so you’ll probably enjoy downloading the raw data and clapping wildly as you make a “Hoo! Hoo!” sound with your mouth and click the sort button on Excel over and over.

Counterpoint: I just need to redirect, I don’t need to get all this other data.

Counter-counterpoint: Die.

#3) What is the best affiliate network?

What is the best beer? What is the best Scotch? This is a stupid question. The opposite question, “What are the worst affiliate networks?” actually yields some useful data about who to avoid and for what reason. Of course when you ask the opposite question, you have to weed through the whiny people who fucked up on their own and blame the affiliate network and these people are very prominent and, unfortunately, very vocal in online marketing.

Getting back to the original question, though, there are ways to make it a less stupid question. You could ask what the best networks are for education offers or what networks have the best AEs, or account executives, (often called AMs, or affiliate managers, in the industry). Maybe you could ask what affiliate networks have the best reporting. Decide what your qualification is for “best” and then ask an intelligent question.

There’s an important caveat here: if you haven’t so much as fucking looked at the networks’ offerings yourself, we will know and we will hate you. The forums don’t exist to do your Goddamn homework for you, so fuck off. Yesterday, at least ten people somewhere on the internet asked whether Commission Junction is better than Linkshare. Yeah, CJ has issues with publisher and advertiser relations that eclipse Linkshare’s, but functionally speaking they tend to have a somewhat similar range of offers from large, branded advertisers. If your question is too broad to make note of this or, even worse, if your question asks something as stupid as “Who has better marketing offers, CJ or LS???” then you deserve to be held down and shat upon by horny Germans.

So, in closing, what is the best affiliate network? Only you can decide, but until you know what the Hell an affiliate network is and what kinds of offers are available from the different kinds of affiliate networks, not only will you not be able to ask an intelligent question, you’ll be too fucking uninformed to understand the answers you’re given.

#4) IS ANYONE ELSE’S [major network] CHECK LATE?!? MY [major network] CHECK IS LATE IS YOUR [major network] CHECK LATE MINE IS?!?! [major network] CHECK LATE?##@??

Fuck you. This always starts the day after checks normally go out. I’ve only seen one or two times in a year that this thread actually turned into a substantive discussion during which it was revealed that a major network sent its checks two fucking days late - you’d have thought it was the apocalypse to read all the fucking howling, crying and impotent threatening. Short of those rare (but still annoying) instances, this thread is always posted by some myopic retard who got fucked by one day because of the postal service.

While the following is probably a larger life lesson of some import, it bears repeating specifically with respect to this: everything is not about you. If your check is late from a major network, ask the Goddamn network. If they’re closed for the day, wait for the next day. If your check is more than a couple of days late, start asking around. If you’re so strapped that getting your check two days late is a major issue in your life then I have some debt consolidation offers that you can fill out.

#5) Should I be building a list?

This is actually not a dumbass question in many cases, but often enough it is. It’s also a topic worth covering, so we’ll add it to the list just for the sake of having useful content on here.

Whether you should be building a list depends on what kind of offers you’re running, there’s no doubt. If you’re running porn offers or ringtones or something of that nature then your user base might be more transient and the typical buying impulse might be as well. Maybe people don’t want to fill out contact info for a porn site and maybe on a ringtone site they’re only likely to give their cell phone number. Who knows? I don’t run that kind of crap. Anyway, not every set of offers is cut out for collecting user info.

All that having been said, a vast majority of the affiliate marketing world consists of offers that ask for some form of personal information and a lot of publishers run these offers. If you’re one of these publishers then you should be building your own list instead of building someone else’s list. Whether these offers are hosted on your servers or the advertiser’s servers or even the affiliate network’s servers, somewhere, somewhen somebody is inputting an email address and other personal info and hitting a submit button. If you’re not on the receiving end of that form then you’re missing out on a goldmine. Certainly you’re going to be better off making the long term gamble and collecting this info for yourself than making the short term gamble and just sending the user off blindly to the network and praying to Jeebus for success.

Let’s break this down another way to explain. A lot of guerilla online marketers have landing pages that redirect to offers that ask for personal info. Really common examples are mortgage, debt, education and loan offers, but plenty of other kinds of offers ask for the same info (Bowflex, Vonage, you name it). If the user is compelled by the advertiser’s creative, hosted elsewhere, to fill out and submit the form then they’re just as likely to be compelled by the same or similar creative hosted on your end. If you can collect this lead information (and other information about the user, such as what keyword they clicked or searched for to get to your site) then you can do a number of things:

  • Email the lead multiple times in the future about similar or other offers.
  • Amass a targeted list and rent or sell it to other online marketers.
  • Set a cookie on your site and pre-populate personalized information on subsequent visits (assuming you expect user retention).
  • Depending on the nature of your offers, pass the user on to a single offer or an offer path consisting of an offer or offers that allow pre-population by the advertiser.
  • Other neat things!

One of the first lessons you learn about direct marketing in school or in practice is that it’s a numbers game. Whatever methods you use to get eyeballs to revenue-generating content, the concept is the same: you’re driving users to content. Every time you drive a user to an offer using a PPC ad, you pay for that click. Every time you drive a user to an offer using a banner ad or other form of placement, you pay for that click. Even with natural search you’re spending day after day tweaking content and, usually, playing against a field of other SEO experts (as well as the SEM companies) to keep your incoming numbers consistent. However many eyeballs you drive, you expect a certain percentage to complete a revenue generating activity. The problem with all the above methods is that they either cost per eyeball or they suffer from instability or both.

When you build a list, you capture the ability to drive eyeballs to your content at the click of a button and to do it at will, over and over. Obviously doing it too much will destroy the effectiveness of your campaign, but we’ll leave the dumbass email marketing discussions for the dumbass email marketing post. And, as mentioned above, there are a number of offers available where it’s possible to capture the lead and still pass the user off to a pre-populated offer (sometimes even to complete the offer locally on your end) meaning that you can often capture a sizable percentage of the revenue you would have captured anyway.

All in all, building a list, assuming you’re already working with lead-generating offers (and often many other kinds of offers), is a win-win proposition and most people who advise against it either have a theological objection to email marketing or simply don’t know what they’re talking about. Get with the fucking program!



(b)adCenter Day 394: Campaign Uploading Surprise!

July 23rd, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

I could do an entire blog just about what a piece of shit adCenter is not only from a user interface point of view, but also from a service point of view and even a support point of view. Basically, I wouldn’t piss on adCenter if it was on fire. In fact, the web could collectively save a lot of time by making a text file containing all the good things about adCenter. 45 seconds after we started, the entire web could go out for drinks - not that I want to drink beer with the ragtag group of libertarians, kiddy fiddlers and pimply MMORPG dorks that make up the net. Back to the point, though, today’s particular issue only seemed worth mentioning because it was so damned odd that hopefully someone else with the same issue might stumble across this blog entry and save him or herself the time of trying to apply logic to adCenter (something one should never do) in discovering a solution.

My current client had been using adCenter for about a year with limited traffic when suddenly, one day, the keywords all showed up paused. Long story short, MSN first claimed it was a glitch, then said the glitch was fixed and then, when it became obvious that they had no control over their shit-tastic application, they mumbled back to the client something about improving the quality of their pages. After a month of re-working the campaign strategy and deciding that MSN’s only value was as a testbed for PPC tactics, I and the client set up a new account with the same keywords pointing to the same pages, in some cases using the same ads. The account is running basically fine, the quality is apparently good enough this time around, so, in short, adCenter is not only a piece of shit, but it’s apparently serviced on the support end by a bunch of Indian call center reps armed with ouija boards and tarot cards.

During the creation of the new campaign, we chose to organize it all ahead of time using the adCenter spreadsheet import template. I have to say that the template does its job fairly well and allows you to create most of what you need automagically. Of course once it’s uploaded we still had to go through the various adgroups tweaking the individual settings one at a time. This takes hours because of the way MSN has implemented their interface and also because everything adCenter touches turns to shit. In any case, having uploaded the campaign and tweaked all the settings we were ready to go.

On day two, we decided to go through and insert our tracking variables into the destination URLs for each adgroup. I did this by hand and got off to a roaring start (which, on adCenter, is defined as four clicks and three minutes to accomplish one URL alteration). About 45 minutes into the affair, I ran across something odd. An adGroup that I had not yet altered, to my shock and amazement, had the dynamic variables in it. Flummoxed, I checked back and forth between other adgroups and couldn’t figure this out, so I kept going and ran into it again. I checked back and forth and thought about this and I finally figured out what was going on.

Normally, when you create an ad inside an adgroup it is saved as a unique ad regardless of content. Because of the nature of our strategy, we had thirty or fourty adgroups each with an individual ad, but sometimes those ads were identical between groups. It turns out that when you import your campaign from a spreadsheet, adCenter groups all the ads together independent of adgroup and assigns them a unique internal AdId, so when you edit an identical ad in adgroup A after uploading and then go check an identical ad in adgroup B, the ad in adgroup B will reflect the changes made to the one in adgroup A.

Thanks, adCenter, for this handy fucking functionality that confused me for at least an hour! Sure, it’s not a huge deal once you know what’s going on, but like every other feature of adCenter it doesn’t work like it should and it causes you grief. Add together all the collective grief caused by all the collective bugs and unexpected “features” and pretty soon you’ve got a gigantic turd of a PPC program.



Behavioral Targeting For The Hoi Polloi Using PPC, Web & Email

July 22nd, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

The online marketing outhouse is full to the shitter’s brim with guerilla online marketers. You know the type, they track their entire operation in a series of confusing spreadsheets, pass keywords straight through to their affiliate networks and generally have no larger idea what they’re doing in architectural or strategic terms, but they make money. These scrappy, rascally nogoodniks are entertaining as Hell and often quite innovative and effective. Why do they make money? Because we’re in online marketing, not online marketing, and these characters are marketers first and foremost.

As they wander our little minefield of a niche, they inevitably bounce off of walls like little market inefficiency-sucking roombas, vacuuming up dollars in one direction until they hit an obstacle, then changing course to repeat the process in another direction. Similar to the wildcatters of yesteryear, they’ll blow out a well and leave it uncapped as long as they can make enough money off the deal to remain profitable - sometimes fucking up things for the rest of us argh.

Inevitably, though, they begin looking around and asking questions. They want to know how those of us in the professional world know all this crazy stuff about cloaking and keyword-ad-landing page targeting and list management. Basically, they get tired of bouncing off the walls and decide they want to become a slower, but more stable and reliable operation (would you rather be Exxon or my broke nonagenarian neighbor back home with no thumbs?). There are a number of ways to go about this and they’re all worth covering, but guerilla behavioral targeting popped into my brain today because it has been in the news lately and it’s one of my favorite topics. If you need evidence of its ascent popularity among the goatee-stroking weberati, simply google “behavioral targeting” or “YAHOO SmartAds.”

As you’ll see, articles about behavioral targeting are chock full of highbrow terms like “cross-channel” and “inventory databases” that try to astound and amaze the reader. Online marketers, generally speaking, are horrible about doing this. We’re marketers and we don’t stop being marketers when we’re not selling products directly, so what do we do when we want to tell people about a new concept? We market it instead of informing about it. Honest to God, if tomorrow every man could suck his own dick, online marketers would be the first people to post on the internet, in glowing terms, about how amazing their autofellatio experience was while imploring you to buy their eBook on how to suck your own dick. As stupid as that sounds, two days later they’d be caught trying to sell eBooks to one another about how to make money on the internet selling eBooks about sucking one’s own dick (if you don’t believe the amount of internal stupidity in the OM community concerning eBooks, visit The Warrior Forums). If you can imagine, it actually would go downhill from there.

Back on topic, in order to make the concept of behavioral targeting accessible and applicable to the guerilla operator looking for a little order in his or her universe, let’s strip out the glittery hoohaa and mojo in order to emerge with a few kernels of shit-stained, corn-like wisdom.

First, what is behavioral targeting? Well it sounds fancy. Is this like marketing spitoons to rednecks? Given a demonstrated preference it could be. Essentially, behavioral targeting is deciding what your user might probably want to buy based on some demonstrated action and then trying to sell it to them. In the real world, where we don’t need fancy new terms to describe ancient concepts, we see behavioral targeting every day. If you go to the same bar and order Singha, a Thai lager, for a couple of days, the bartender is going to notice this and, on the third day, he or she will probably offer you a Singha or suggest another kind of lager. Sim sim sala bim, you have just been behaviorally targeted by your local bartender! Fucking magic! YAHOO: Catching up with bartenders everywhere since 2007. Let’s analyze the factors at work here though, just to make sure they’re obvious:

  1. You demonstrated a preference for a certain brand of beer: Singha.
  2. You demonstrated a preference for a certain type of beer: lager.
  3. The bartender was making a mental record of these preferences.
  4. After two visits, a given level of probability was reached in the bartender’s mind concerning your beer preference.
  5. On the subsequent visit, the bartender used his or her knowledge about your demonstrated preference for Singha and your probable preference for lager and made a suggestion.
  6. YAHOO sends in teams to model this complex sociological interaction and capture lightning in a bottle - Shazam!

This kind of dynamic targeting has been going on online forever, at least since outfits like firefly started working on it back in the heady dotconomy days. The most famous online example, of course, is Amazon’s “we thought you might like” content that consists of books or other products suggested based on your browsing habits, but they didn’t invent the concept. What makes it interesting to apply in online marketing is the distributed nature of this field. We operate through many different promotional channels (PPC, email, blogs, SEO, etc) using many different revenue generating content sources (CPC, affiliate offers, etc); However, unlike Amazon, we often control only some or very little of these channels, making the collection of information more difficult.

Because of these factors, in the guerilla online marketing world it’s quite common that you don’t have more than one shot to hook a user, let alone guess at his or her preference. Let’s suppose that you’re advertising weight loss affiliate offers through a PPC campaign that dumps users on a landing page that you control. A user clicks on your PPC weight loss ad and lands on your landing page that has several different offers, one diet program, one fat loss cream and one abs of titanium machine - all of which are form submits. The user enters information into your hosted diet program form and presses submit - hallelujhah! You then record this info into your ESP (your email service provider, like getresponse or aweber) and pass the user on to the affiliate network who then passes the user on to the diet program offer. Unfortunately, unlike Amazon, the probability of that user visiting your page again naturally or even clicking on another of your PPC weight loss ads at a later date is probably very small, so you have to gather what info you can when you can - and what info was there to gather?

  1. The user demonstrated a preference for a certain market vertical: weight loss.
  2. The user demonstrated a preference for a certain type of product in that vertical: diet programs.
  3. You collected the user’s information.

So far so good, but if the flow of information stops there then you are officially worse at marketing than your local bartender. Dumbass! Obviously we’re assuming here that you, the guerilla online marketer, don’t have the capability to create a database to collect this information automatically and the programming skills to create systems that act on this information dynamically, so what can you do to behaviorally target this user? Well, keeping it simple, there are a couple of things.

You can start at the ESP level. Using the current example (where you’re hosting offers and passing the data) and pretending that you’re using aweber, you could add an autoresponder labeled “weight loss” and define custom fields to hold the demographic information you’ve captured:

  1. Create a custom field in your new weight loss autoresponder called: subvertical - (diet, exercise, etc).
  2. Create a custom field in your new weight loss autoresponder called: keyword - (’how to lose weight’, ‘herbalife’, etc.)
  3. Create a custom field in your new weight loss autoresponder called: referrer - (http://www.google.com/… = ‘Google’, etc).
  4. Create a custom field in your new weight loss autoresponder called: source - (the proper name of your site - ‘Super Diet Site’, etc).

Now, change your normal hosted form to point to your aweber autoresponder form. Insert all of these variables automatically using either hardcoded variables <input type=”hidden” name=”subvertical” value=”diet” /> or dynamic variables that you collected from the incoming PPC link <input type=”hidden” name=”keyword” value=”<?php echo $keyword; ?>” />. Also, be sure that you have the meta_redirect_onlist hidden form field set, in addition to your standard thank you page, to keep your users from seeing an error message if their address is already on the list. The final step in ensuring the user flow is to verify that your thank you pages point to either a cloaked URL on your site (that forwards on) or to your appointed affiliate offers. If you’re able to pass information to these pages to pre-populate forms on the affiliate end you can still do this by using forwarded variables (aweber’s terminology) in the appropriate part of the querystring so that they get transmitted back to your cloaking page or directly to the affiliate network (this might look like &em={!email}).

Once you’ve done this, go to your affiliate networks and pick out one, or a few weight loss related offers and build an email around the offer or offers. This can be a welcome message or a pure sales message or whatever you feel is most appropriate to your campaign (this depends heavily on whether you’re running a branded site or not). This email will be launched automatically when someone joins your list. Don’t forget in creating this email that you have available to you a number of variables now, including the keyword that the user searched on {!custom keyword}, the network they searched for this word on {! custom referrer} and more.

Having created your initial follow-up message, it’s time to schedule some follow up messages at regular intervals - once a week, once a month, whatever you like. It’s also time to segment your list further using the subvertical custom variable and the ‘view’ functionality of aweber. You’ve stored ‘diet’ in the custom subvertical field for every person that filled out the diet program form and ‘exercise’ in the custom subvertical field for every person that filled out the abs of titanium form. In the Leads section of aweber, search in this autoresponder list for leads where the subvertical is ‘diet’. When the list is returned, save it as a view. Now, go back to the messages section and build an email marketing message specifically about diet programs. Do the same for all your other subverticals and, when you’re ready, send them to your newly saved views that are made up entirely of leads that have expressed an interest in the subvertical that the email message is built for.

Assuming you’ve done all this, what have you now accomplished? You’ve got a cross-channel, behavioral targeting system that sees an incoming PPC click, sends information about the PPC campaign to your ESP, passes the user on to an affiliate offer and then automatically launches an email campaign for each new registration based on the market vertical (weight loss) of the product that they signed up under. This system will email them at scheduled intervals with your pre-selected offers and automatically create revenue with no further intervention from you. Furthermore, you have the same users targeted at the subvertical level (diet, exercise, gels & creams) by view and at the click of a button you can send them messages specifically targeted at that subvertical.

Obviously I skipped over a lot of the mundane details here under the assumption that anyone reading this already understands their ESP program, their PPC program and how to build their own landing pages. Sure, this system wouldn’t pass muster with the standards and practices crowd and it’s nothing that one would use at the enterprise level because there would larger systems available to gather more specific data, access internally controlled channels and carry out more specific actions, but if you’re a guerilla marketer - usually a one man shop - you simply don’t have these capabilities at your disposal. Assuming you’re one of the guerilla gorillas and you’re using a cobbled together system made up of third party tools, this is a quick and easy way to get your systems working for you to automatically generate revenue based off of user behaviors.



Uncov Rips Flowery, Sunshine-Up-The-Butt-Blower A New One

July 21st, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

The field of online marketing is 80% full of shameless self-promoters who ruin it for the other 20% of us by trying to guise themselves either as knowledgeable experts who mysteriously speak only in buzzwords and of only insanely-broad concepts or as honest brokers who aren’t trying to sell you what they’re actually trying to sell you while they’re trying to sell you on it. You know, it’s how the rest of you feel about our entire field. Microcosms within microcosms. I imagine even the shysters and the blowhards have other shysters and blowhards that they can’t stand.

Uncov is a new blog dedicated to two things: sarcastic cynicism concerning our larger industry and Idiocracy. There are few hobbies dearer to my heart. The other day, they wrote a scathing blog post about the hollow insight of a particular member of the web 2.0 propaganda brigade, Steve Rubel. Rather than reproducing it here, I’ll simply link to it:

http://www.uncov.com/2007/7/17/internets-marketing-serious-business

I did want to add that if more blogs spent more time deconstructing this kind of technowank fluff job nonsense then maybe every time I download an episode of Charlie Rose or flip through my favorite tech news sources, I wouldn’t have to pick through ten pounds of shit to get to one ounce of corn. At the very least, if we could stick a cork in the shitpipe of the self-fellating web 2.0 obsessed AJAX 9000 blogdroids then maybe the signal to noise ratio on our end of the web would level back out to something resembling tolerable.

Just a thought.



Gaming The PPC/Proxy Site Nexus

July 20th, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

I work on a variety of projects in online marketing and I’m pretty busy already, so this is nothing I’ve actually tried or even plan to try, but I thought I’d float it out there because I’ve not heard of it being done and it struck me as interesting.

I know that proxy sites are all the rage because they’re easy to set up and people can, with little labor, arbitrage them using CPC ads. I personally work in the affiliate-email-ppc-content site world, so this isn’t my bread and butter, but that doesn’t stop me from daydreaming on occasion. Last week I was checking Google from here in Asia without a proxy and a person who works with my client forgot for a moment about the territorial restrictions on the client’s PPC ads. He asked why our ads didn’t rank on the first page and I replied that “The ads aren’t showing up because they’re US only.” Following our exchange, we got into a discussion about using free net access to funnel people into an obscure IP range geolocated in a small or medium sized foreign country and then bidding up US-based ads in that country only while linking the ads to your sites.

I quickly pointed out that most people don’t use free net access and that providing it would be a pain and the discussion ended because, you know, we had actual work to do. Fast forward to the next day and this puzzle was still gnawing away at my brain. In theory, you could accomplish the same thing using proxy sites, instead of free net access, to small or medium sized countries. When the ads are presented through the proxy site, it would simply be necessary to have them launch in a new window, which would launch outside of the confines of the proxy and, therefore, place the user within a geolocated US IP range. This would obviate the problem with foreign IPs killing affiliate ads on the affiliate network end of the equation. The obvious benefit here is that bidding on terms in these obscure countries would no doubt be cheaper and you’d be competing for much less traffic, segmented to your chosen language and provided largely by you. Quite literally, you would have your very own captive audience.

I’ve been in this business for ten years, which is long enough to know that when you have a new idea it’s only new until you hit Google and figure out someone else has done it, but I thought this one was interesting enough to post about even if it has been done. I’d be interested to find out what experience anyone has had with such a method.



PPC Marketing Strategy: An Unorthodox Approach

July 19th, 2007
by On-On
Make The Lorax Cry :(  Make The Lorax Cry :(

(Welcome to version 2 of bayongblog. I over-reached on version 1, trying to write long articles and then version 1 was hacked thanks to a security hole in WordPress that I didn’t patch. Nothing screams ‘competence’ like having ‘hAcK3D bY sCr1pT k1dD13s’ on a hacked placeholder page for your domain. Anyway, thanks to the script kiddies, I have another shot.)

PPC can be a bit of a black box affair at best, largely because the networks involved feed us shit and keep us in the dark when it comes to many of the algorithms and metrics used to decide how, when and where they display our ads as well as how much they charge us and why that is. While they give us a lot of information, they never give us quite enough to figure the puzzle out (Quality Score ).

The client I’m currently working with has a medium-large sized PPC program that runs completely an auto-pilot: thousands of keywords lumped together in a very few adgroups on which they spend deeply into five figures a month all with absolutely no internal tracking other than total conversions per network. Over the last month or so, I’ve been working with a junior employee at the company to architect a PPC strategy and definea PPC manager role. During this time, we’ve been playing around with all kinds of small tactics to get better control of our programs and I think that last week witnessed a watershed moment.

During a drunken dinner out with what happened to be all the male members of the local staff, I requested that everyone please go home and beat off with their left hands that night. The next morning conversions were up about 10-12%. I am a PPC wizard.




Copyright © 2007 bayonblog.com. Some rights reserved, some thrown carefree to the wind. Other logos and trademarks found in this site are the property of their respective owners, some are just plain silly. Ask forgiveness for using the content on this page before asking permission, but please offer attribution links either way (we do). Teams of attorneys have spent days poring over this disclaimer, so please contact us with any questions.